Peregrine 16vsSawtooth X Low Waterproof
Products · full comparison

Peregrine 16 vs Sawtooth X Low Waterproof

data as of July 6 · updated weekly

How these two compare on everything we measure — where the AIs rank them, what reviewers and buyers say, and how they price. The differences are the point — they decide which one is yours.

Peregrine 16
by Saucony · Trail running shoes
AI rank #13.0 fused across 5 questions in Hiking Shoes↓2$119.71–$150
Reviewers
4.0/5
Buyers
4.4/5
vs
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
by Oboz · Waterproof low hiking shoes
AI rank #19.5 fused across 5 questions in Hiking Shoes↑3$180–$185
Reviewers
/5
Buyers
3.9/5

Side by side

Every signal we hold, on one shared scale. The leading side is lit — and where the AI panel and the reviewers pull apart, the row says so.?

#13.0↓2
AI rankcombined avg · lower is betterfused across 5 questions in Hiking Shoes
#19.5↑3
4.0
Reviewersout of 5
4.4
BuyersGoogle rating
3.9
$119.71–$150
Street pricelower is cheaper
$180–$185
How this is made

Built from what 2 AI models (Perplexity · ChatGPT) recommend for real buyer questions, layered with reviewer test summaries, Google buyer ratings, street prices and press. The short answer and verdict are derived from where those signals diverge — not written by hand for either product.

Independent — not a vendor, not advertising, not a paid review. How we score →

01

Which is better for what

Across the buyer-questions both appear in, who the AI panel ranks higher — and the widest gaps.?

Best Lightweight Hiking Shoes Peregrine 16 by 27#3 vs #30
Best Hiking Shoes for Beginners Sawtooth X Low Waterproof by 10#19 vs #9
Best Hiking Shoes for Wide Feet Sawtooth X Low Waterproof by 5#17 vs #12
Across 3 shared questions: Peregrine 16 higher in 1 · Sawtooth X Low Waterproof in 2
Showing the 3 widest gaps
02

Critics & buyers

The human jury in one chapter — what the video reviewers score and say, the reviews behind it, and how Google buyers rate them.

What reviewers say

Distilled from the video reviewers — the score, what they praise, where they push back.?

Peregrine 16
across 5 reviews
4.0/5
divided
Reviewers praise
  • Vibram MegaGrip outsole delivers confident traction on wet, rocky, and technical terrain across most test conditions
  • Increased midsole stack adds noticeable cushioning and protection over longer distances without eliminating ground feel
  • Secure, well-fitting upper with good midfoot lockdown, a roomy toe box, and comfortable heel collar straight out of the box
Reviewers push back
  • One experienced reviewer found the Vibram lugs shallower than the previous proprietary outsole, leaving grip wanting in deep, heavy mud
  • Fit may edge tight on the little toes for some runners, particularly on longer efforts
  • PWRRUN midsole foam is mid-tier — functional and durable but not Saucony's most energetic compound
The Peregrine 16 is a well-rounded trail shoe that earns broad praise for its Vibram MegaGrip outsole and added cushioning, though one reviewer found the grip disappointing on heavy mud compared to the previous outsole.
— best for: Trail runners covering varied terrain — forest, mountain, rock, and moderate mud — who want a lightweight, cushioned all-rounder with reliable traction and a secure, comfortable fit.
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
no reviewer coverage yet
Reviewers disagree · Peregrine 16?
Alastair Running 5.0/5
The Run Testers 3.0/5

Outsole grip quality divides reviewers: most celebrate the Vibram MegaGrip as a long-overdue upgrade, but The Run Testers found it inferior to the old power-track rubber in sustained muddy conditions

What buyers say

Aggregated Google Shopping ratings — the score, the aspects owners rate, and a real quote.?

4.4
128 ratings
Grip & traction4.2
Fit & comfort3.6
Stability & security4.0
Cushioning & responsiveness4.1
This is my 6th pair of Peregrine’s, and probably my favourite. I’ve had the 8, 10 x 2, 10 GTX, 13 GTX and now the 16s. Compared to the 13s, the 16s feel roomier with a wider toe box and mid foot. Less heel cushion that pushes you forward and shortens the shoe so I feel like I have more room. The extra cushioning is noticeable but not obtrusive. The vibram sole is very grippy. I run in PNW/Vancouve Mom2Boys · saucony.com
Google ratings
3.9
498 ratings
Durability & stitching quality1.8
Comfort & fit4.2
Waterproofing2.1
Traction & sole grip4.0
I'm in the mountains, hike daily and usually keep five or so boots/shoes in rotation. Different tools for different jobs. I had a pair of Bridgers about five years ago and they crapped out way too soon. Saw these on sale, they had the structure i was looking for and went for it. Got them a couple of months ago, they have roughly 200 miles on them and am glad to say they're showing very little wear TJF · REI
03

How they price

Street price across retailers, the tier each lands in, and how it’s moved.?

$119.71–$150
across 5 retailers
tier Value
current street price
current model
$180–$185
across 5 retailers
tier Premium
current street price
current model
04

Can you trust the claims

Each maker’s marketing weighed against independent tests — how many claims hold up, and the weakest one.?

Peregrine 16Peregrine 16
80
Mostly honest, overstates fit adaptability
3 hold up2 mixed0 overstated
Weakest claim
PromisePWRTRAC outsole with aggressive traction
RealityExcellent on rock/wet, weaker in heavy mud
Sawtooth X Low WaterproofSawtooth X Low Waterproof
25
Honest on comfort, overstates waterproofing and durability
0 hold up1 mixed1 overstated
Weakest claim
PromiseB-DRY waterproof and breathable technology
RealityWaterproofing fails due to stitching breakdown
05

The verdict: which to buy

Our read of everything above — who leads each point, and who each is for.

Peregrine 16
AI panel rank
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
Peregrine 16
Reviewer score
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
Peregrine 16
Buyer rating
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
Peregrine 16
Lower price
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
Peregrine 16
Marketing honesty
Sawtooth X Low Waterproof

Net: Peregrine 16 leads 5 of 5 · Sawtooth X Low Waterproof 0.

So which one?

Peregrine 16 leads more points — but check where it loses.

We don’t crown a winner. Both are strong; the differences above decide it for your use. Where a signal is missing, we leave it blank rather than guess.

as of July 6 · 3 shared buyer questions?

06

Common questions

The questions people ask comparing these two — answered from the data above.

QIs Peregrine 16 or Sawtooth X Low Waterproof better overall?

The AI panel ranks Peregrine 16 higher (avg #13.0 fused across 5 questions in Hiking Shoes vs #19.5), but it’s close — reviewers and buyers split differently.

QWhich one is cheaper?

Peregrine 16$119.71–$150 vs $180–$185 across retailers.

QHow do buyers rate them?

Google buyers give Peregrine 16 4.4 and Sawtooth X Low Waterproof 3.9 out of 5.

QIs Peregrine 16 worth it over its predecessor?

Its predecessor in the line is the Peregrine 15. We track Peregrine 16 at #13.0 on the AI panel and 4.0/5 with reviewers; the Peregrine 15 page shows how the older model holds up.